Was just playing with modelling tool and trying to show to a young person how options can become clearer when drawing pictures (and models). It became a magical moment of shared creation.
In the picture you have the "honest" person box in right bottom. Working to get money for pleasure and expenses. And possibly also save some for later consumption. (Later consumption illustrated with a delay arrow.)
In the dashed box you have the criminal acting. Doing crimes to get money from the honest persons.
To stop the criminal we pay tax to get police officers. And the police have (at least) three things to do. Put criminals in jail (assuming they are guilty of course), stop crimes and possibly try to stop money "transfer" to criminal.
We could also spend time (work) to try to stop the criminal from stealing our money.
When we put the criminal in jail he becomes a prisoner. And after that he becomes an honest person. (We hope).
Of course the model is incomplete (In fact all models are...or should be?). But the most interesting thing was how easy it was to continue discussion about the model and how reality works. The youngster added a lot of questions and perspectives. And we could easily have built a more detailed model. And also find some "solutions" to the problem we could spot in the model.
Like "How do we make sure that the prisoner becomes an honest person?" and "How do we deal when criminals steals from other criiminals?"
I love to see how shared modelling and storytelling sparks thinking and discussions.
When you now see this model I do not think you get the same value from it as we did when doing it.
Key is "shared creation". The model and modelling is the playground for this "shared creation".
The shared creation process is often more important than the resulting model. But, the model is very valuable when we want to continue the shared creation or move on to problem solving, discussions, presentations,...