tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3941907638371810246.post7120729555709223755..comments2015-07-26T14:30:00.506+02:00Comments on jangan dabla thinking: Make-up or Photoshop?a jangbrandhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14149892339790111307noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3941907638371810246.post-57297487219963143722009-12-17T07:34:07.260+01:002009-12-17T07:34:07.260+01:00But the consumers of cosmetic will not be able to ...But the consumers of cosmetic will not be able to what the 'platform' looked like. They will only see the end-result - not what it was applied on. So, there are no guarantees that there were any wrinkles to cover (on the model)...<br />One could add a "Before"/"After"-shot of course. But then you might have to consider a video as well showing HOW to apply the cosmetics. And possibly showing if the model herself OR a professional crew is needed to apply the make-up.<br />Is not every commercial about "cheating"? Not telling the truth but create images, dreams and inspiration?a jangbrandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14149892339790111307noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3941907638371810246.post-57878106635488217822009-12-16T22:54:09.552+01:002009-12-16T22:54:09.552+01:00There certainly seems to be a functional equivalen...There certainly seems to be a functional equivalence between the two mechanisms for concealing facial defects. However, passing off one mechanism for the other is thought to be ethically problematic. Consumers of cosmetics may feel cheated by an airbrushed advertisement, because they want to know (and they believe the advert is telling them) the best way to hide their own wrinkles.Richard Veryardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04499123397533975655noreply@blogger.com