tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3941907638371810246.post6164313423818279557..comments2015-07-26T14:30:00.506+02:00Comments on jangan dabla thinking: Forever thinkinga jangbrandhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14149892339790111307noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3941907638371810246.post-55598653415222724232009-06-30T10:58:28.659+02:002009-06-30T10:58:28.659+02:00Yes! Excellent. Thanks!Yes! Excellent. Thanks!a jangbrandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14149892339790111307noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3941907638371810246.post-32097289256843406302009-06-30T10:52:35.808+02:002009-06-30T10:52:35.808+02:00Nice post. I think your "forever thinking&qu...Nice post. I think your "forever thinking" should be a much larger part of strategic thinking done by organizations--at least so they consider what they do, even for a moment, in this context.<br /><br />I also think that it might be very useful in the context of "non-forever" activities. When you are forced to ask "Will this last forever?" and you answer "No", that might be perfectly reasonable--if the next question you ask is "Why not?"<br /><br />Answering the "Why not?" question might then give you greater insights into how best to design your "interim" solution, even if that interim is 50 years. Most thinking, be it operation, tactical or strategic, fails to account for the end game. Maybe by adopting your approach, it forces you to think a bit about the end game for those durations too, with the end result being better plans overall.<br /><br />I know that's not quite what you intended, but I think it gives a very useful perspective in that sense too. ;)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com